I was having a think about what kind of things might actually excite me in a new tech device, in the way a new Creative MP3 player used to (lol):
- no AI included, or somehow even blocked entirely at OS/hardware level
- look more visually interesting as an object, not just a glass block
- physical buttons? Or more of a sense of the materiality of design beyond glass and screens
- deliberate restrictions or limited affordances, like no screens or only audio interfaces (Apple TV+’s Sunny had an interesting depiction of this, thought this’d require even more AI I guess)
- dumbing down devices and ability to impair their surveillance at a more foundational/hardware level
- making some actual design decisions that lead to functions or features being removed?
Designers seem to need constraints to do interesting stuff. We should be demanding more limits on devices instead of affordances.
- Sent from my Nokia 7110
This article by Andrew Lynch and César Albarrán-Torres dunks so hard on A24, I absolutely loved it:
Tried to explain this, one of the greatest moments on the internet, to my kids and it was surprisingly difficult. We are losing the ancient texts.
I was wondering what they’re up to on Chapo Trap House since Matt Christman had his stroke/left the show (I haven’t listened in a long time). Only Australians will understand how poorly it must be going:
This sounds like something to know in advance. At 2pm AEST next Monday 27 July Australia’s new national warning system will send a test alert to phones and some tablets and smart watches. They’ll vibrate and emit a siren-like sound for about 10 seconds.
What I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. Like destroying every shoe and cable in your house.
With every day I’m more convinced we’re living in Eddington. Even though the film was set six years ago, it’s happening now (and probably for the foreseeable future).
”Drawing on a critical meta-synthesis of cross-disciplinary literature, supported by ChatGPT-4o DeepResearch, the paper develops a reflexively grounded research guide for navigating methodological practice in an increasingly complex research landscape shaped by geopolitical contestation and renewed demands for equity and inclusion”
A “reflexively grounded research guide” based on whose reflexivity exactly?
People routinely misunderstand Judge Dredd but this is an all-time standout: a LinkedIn post saying the lesson we need to learn from it is about human-in-the-loop AI use.
That torment nexus tweet wasn’t satire at all.
When this masthead visited Merrylands on Thursday to talk to locals about their experience of organised crime, no one approached was willing to share their story.
lmao
This is bleak, even for the Torment Nexus.
I’m terrible at picking AI writing. A coin toss would be more reliable than me.
We shouldn’t over-sentimentalise reading as a practice, however I now get student feedback complaints when I set 4 page HBR magazine-style articles as course readings.
Watching The Movie Show episodes from 1999 on SBS on Demand. What an incredible year for film, every episode has a film I still watch or need to rewatch.









